BC SUPREME COURT
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

CRIMINAL LAW 1999

• SS99-2169 R. v. Zubrecki
• SS99-2168 R . v. Boehm
• S99-2167 R. v. Boehm
• S99-2166 HMTQ v. Mirzaie
• S99-2164 R. v. Denison
• S99-2159 HMTQ v. Polukoshko
• S99-2158 USA v. Fong
• S99-2157 Mr. and Mrs. Glen Clark v. HMTQ
• S99-2156 HMTQ v. Derksen
• S99-2155 HMTQ v. Francis
• S99-2154 HMTQ v. Trinh
• S99-2134 HMTQ v. Russell et al
• S99-2150 HMTQ v. Webber
• S99-2148 United States of America v. Chao
• S99-2147 United States of America v. Chao
• S99-2153 HMTQ v. Dobbie
• R. v. Walker
• HMTQ v. Glowatski
• HMTQ  v.  Sorrentino
• HMTQ v. Walker
• R. v. T.K.
• Kingdom of Thailand v. Saxena
• R. v. Van Osselaer
• R. v. Van Osselaer
• R. v. Van Osselaer
• R. v. Van Osselaer
• R. v. Van Osselaer
• R. v. Murrin
• R. v. Murrin - February 9, 1999
• R. v. Murrin - May 28, 1999
• R. v. Murrin - June 24, 1999
• R. v. Murrin - July 29, 1999
• R. v. Murrin - December 6, 1999
• R. v. Stupich
• R. v. Rindero
• Lacroix v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles
• R. v. Callison
• R. v. Callison
• R. v. MacDougal
• R. v. Murrin
• R. v. Vallee
• R. v. William Gibson Brown
• Khadikin v.  R.
• R. v. Glen Alexander Paruk
• R. v. Wilbert Douglas Lambert
• R. v. William Thomas Williamson
• R. v. Vincent Earl Nagel-Joseph
• R. v. Gollan
• R. v. Laboucan
• R. v. Blue
• Terezakis v. Department of Justice
• R. v. Getson
• R. v. Sandhu & Boudreau
• R. v. Swanson
• R. v. Cretney
• R. v. Reed
• R. v. Coelen
• R. v. Barclay
• Hickey v. Kent Institution
• R. v. Scott Gar Loong Lowrie
• R. v. Dean Walter Kupchanko
• R. v. Raza
• Cerrato v. HMTQ
• R. v. Sharma
• R. v. L.S.U. (No. 1)
• R. v. L.S.U. (No. 2)
• Khadikin v. HMTQ
• R. v. Chesham
• Nathawad et al. v. Minister of National Revenue et al.
• HMTQ v. Pham
• Thomas v. HMTQ
• R. v. Girard
• R. v. Gourlay
• R. v. Smith
• HMTQ v. Cooper
• Thailand v. Saxena
• HMTQ v. Russell et al.
• R. v. Clarence Shane Li
• R. v. Naumenko
• R. v. Murray Ronald Williams
• Commissioner of RCMP v. Christiansen
• The Attorney General of British Columbia and His Honour Judge Cronin and Dawson Davidson
• R. v. L.S.U.
• R. v. Franken
• R. v. Schwatz
• R. v. Schlick
• R. v. Barreda et al. (No.1)
• R. v. Barreda et al. (No. 2)
• R. v. Barreda et al. (No. 3)
• Re Stuckey
• R. v. Russell et al.
• R. v. Clendenning
• R. v. Russell et al.
• R. v. Nelson
• R. v. Alpha Manufacturing Inc. et al.
• R. v. Glowatski
• R. v. Glowatski
• R. v. Brass
• R. v. Nelson
• R. v. Huovinen et al.
• R. v. P.M.C.
• R. v. Zubrecki
• R. v. Ibrahim
• R. v. Bolton
• R. v. Asqari
• R. v. L.L.J.
• R. v. Carlick
• R. v. Campagna
• R. v. Campagna
• R. v. Reyklin
• R. v. Lapointe
• HMTQ v. Bolton
• R. v. D.M.M.
• R. v. Moussalli
• R. v. Fabbiano
• R. v. Demers
• R. v. Garwood
• HMTQ v. J.D.G.
• HMTQ v. Ryan
• Banks v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada
• Renaerts v. Korn et al (#2)
• Renaerts v. Korn et al (#1)
• HMTQ v. Farley
• HMTQ v. Antler
• R. v. York et al.
• R. v. J.D.G.
• R. v. A.B.
• R. v. J.D.G.
• R. v. Weber
• Laird v. HMTQ
• R. v. J.D.G.
• R. v. Liu
• R. v. Armistead (No. 1)
• R. v. Armistead (No. 2)
• HMTQ v. Jackson
• R. v. Lange
• HMTQ v. Griffioen et al.
• R. v. Arsenault
• HMTQ v. BCTV et al.
• Derry v. R.
• R. v. Drescher
• R. v. MacDonald
• R. v. M. (P.E.)
• R. v. White
• R. v. George
• R. v. Redd
• R. v. Johnson
• R. v. Moreno & Cornell
• R. v. Muir
• R. v. Acton
• R. v. Lowe
• R. v. Schreiner
• R. v. Karbin
• R. v. Karbin
• R. v. Schreiner
• R. v. Wilson
• R. v. Rovers
• Thailand v. Saxena
• R. v. Hughes
• R. v. Nicholson
• R. v. Nicholson
• R. v. Royston
• USA v. Cheema
• R. v. Ku
• R. v. Diep
• Louie v. HMTQ
• R. v. Hardt
• R. v. Bradley
• R. v. Schuster et al.
• R. v. White
• R. v. Ekman
• R. v. Lees
• R. v. Bradley
• R. v. Glowatski
• R. v. Royston
• R. v. Bennett
• R. v. Gibson
• R. v. Kristensen
• R. v. Carlick
• R. v. Kim
• R. v. Carrie
• R. v. Posselt
• R. v. Glowatski
• Weaver v. Warden of William Head Institution
• HMTQ v. Collins et al.
• The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands v. Clarkson
• In the Matter of a Petition for Mandamus and Joseph Reed
• R. v. Creek
• R. v. Vereczki
• R. v. Lorenz
• R. v. Alhakim
• Thailand v. Rakesh Saxena
• R. v. N.H.M.
• R. v. Smith
• R. v. Hull
• R. v. Nodge
• R. v. Quellet et al.
• R. v. Weber
• R. v. Friesen
• Morrow v. HMTQ
• R. v. R.J.E.
• R. v. Holmes
• R. v. Nadeau
• R. v. Poulton
• R. v. Sweeney
• R. v. Carpenter
• R. v. Price
• R. v. Kyllo et al.
• R. v. Matthews et al.
• R. v. Tait
• R. v. Bernier
• R. v. Bernier
• R. v. Baker
• R. v. Feeney
• AGBC v. Bridges
• R. v. Chung
• R. v. Emard
• R. v. Clement
• R. v. Arnold
• R. v. Au Canada Monetary Exchange et al
• R. v. McPherson
• R. v. Fitzsimons et al.
• R. v. Castro et al.
• R. v. Hughes et al.
• R. v. Stewart
• R. v. Miller
• R. v. Scott
• R. v. Jacobs
• R. v. Vu
• R. v. Vu
• R. v. Gardiner
• R. v. Minty
• R. v. Schuster et al.
• R. v. Sarava
• R. v. Walker
• U.S.A. v. Davis
• R. v. Sandover-Sly et al.
• R. v. Korlak
• R. v. Sharpe
• R. v. Hughes
• R. v. Nguyen