B.C. SUPREME COURT
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 1995

• 356447 British Columbia Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank
• 369145 B.C. Ltd. v. Connell
• 453259 B.C. Ltd. v. S.& A. Developments Ltd.
• Addey v. Addey
• Arend v. Seely
• Arkell v. Clark
• Arnold v. Power
• Austin v. Austin
• Auto Marine Electric Ltd. v. Hnidan
• B.C. Tel v. A.E. Fair Contracting Ltd.
• Bentall Properties Ltd. v. Carhoun
• Bernardelli v. Dylex Ltd.
• Best v. Cote
• British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Buller
• Bruno v. Arksey
• Camosun Properties Ltd. v. Douglas Shopping Centre Ltd.
• Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Charbonnages de France International
• Cannaday v. McPherson
• Chetwynd Environmental Society v. Dyer
• Chetwynd v. Dyer
• Concorde Pacific Developments Ltd. v. Vancouver (City of)
• Cripps (Trustee of)
• CTF Holdings Ltd. v. Flint Motors Ltd.
• Culos Development Corp. v. High Street Developments Ltd.
• Daishowa Canada Co. Ltd. v. Mannesmann Demag Ltd.
• Davidson v. Ergologic Enterprises Inc.
• Davis v. Jung
• Dewhurst Estate v. Schmidtke
• Dixon v. Garland
• Dixon v. Garland
• Dorchester v. Surrey
• Double Eagle Entertainement Corp. v. Doolan
• Edwards v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia
• Fletcher v. Fletcher
• Forest Industry v. Walker
• Foundation Company of Canada Ltd. v. United Grain Growers Limited
• Freeman v. Freeman
• Garner v. Hunnings
• Gates v. Bolen
• Ghag v. Charlie
• Ghidoni v. Ghidoni
• Gill v. Gill
• Hamel v. Hamel
• Harvey v. Harvey
• Hodgson v. Butler
• Holmes, Greenslade v. Starcom International Optics Corporation
• Hughes v. Hughes
• Hughes v. Hughes
• Inter-Coastal BKR Development Group v. Cadillac Care Inc.
• International Land Corp. Ltd. v. Race Rock Yacht Services Ltd.
• Kent v. Bosch
• Kim v. Salzi
• Kinch v. Kinch
• Kneeshaw v. Kneeshaw
• Koughnett v. Koughnett
• Lafarge Construction Materials Precast Division v. Lawson
• La Joie Lake Holdings Ltd. Estate
• Lim v. Lim
• Lin v. Tang
• Loher v. Carreiro
• Lonquist v. Lonquist
• MacDonald v. MacDonald
• Madill v. Townsend
• Marco Polo Construction Ltd. v. Haggart Developments Ltd.
• Maxham v. Excalabur International Capital Corp.
• McBeth v. Boldt
• McCulloch v. Green
• Menard v. Phillips
• Mickelson v. mickelson
• Miller's Landing pub Ltd. v. Labour and Consumer (Minister of)
• Moore v. The Corp. of the District of saanich
• M.S.A. Ford Sales Ltd. v. Rand & Fowler Insurance Ltd.
• Naidu v. Welter
• Nanaimo (City of) v. Korolek
• Nanaimo (City of) v. Korolek
• Nanji v. Hewlett
• New West Gypsum Recycling v. Alpha Manufacturing Inc.
• Nichols v. Central Guaranty Trust Co.
• Nielson v. Kanashiro
• O'Brien v. Board of school Trustees
• O'Shea v. Magee
• Preston v. Richardson
• Prodanovic v. T. Eaton Co.
• Pro Star Mechanical Contractors Ltd. v. Ladysmith
• Ptak v. Ptak
• Quality Carpets Ltd. (Trustee of)
• Quality Travel Inc. v. Chan
• Ranger Oil Ltd. v. Huk
• Rasmussen v. 483757 B.C. Ltd.
• Raycraft v. Gordon ""N"" Gordon Interiors Ltd.
• Re Domtar Inc. v. R.
• ReStella-Jones Inc. v. R.
• Rice v. Rice
• Richer v. Graham
• Richview Investments Inc. v. Dynasty Social Club
• Rudersdorfer v. Rudersdorfer
• R. v. Charters
• R. v. Coombs
• R. v. Dhaliwal
• R. v. Good
• R. v. Good
• R. v. Lavery
• R. v. Martindale
• R. v. Yeomans
• Sans v. Merrick
• Saran v. Saran
• Scholton v. Chemainus Health Care Centre
• Scotch FirMcRae Estates Ltd.v. McRae
• Sherman v. Sherman
• Sidhu v. Grewal
• Simpson v. Simpson
• Smith Estate
• Smith v. Smith
• Stafford v. Motomochi
• Stevenson v. Popoff
• Strange v. Maple meadows Mobile Home Park Ltd.
• Stubbins v. Johnson
• Summers v. Jim Pattison Industries
• Swyers v. Drenth
• The Business Depot Ltd. v. Lehndorff Management Ltd.
• Thorne v. Dryden-Hall
• Toby v. Alberni Marine Transportation
• Trakalo v. Hodges
• Transportation and Highways (Minister of)
• Turcotte v. Charles
• United Properties Ltd. v. Degelder Construction Co. Ltd.
• Walker v. Walker
• Webster v. Levens
• Will Millar Associates Co. Ltd. v. Millar
• Wright v. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada
• Yaghoobian v. Yaghoobian
• Yavis (Trustee of)
• Yorkville Homes Inc. Estate
• Zelmer v. Victor Projects Ltd.