B.C. COURT OF APPEAL
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

FAMILY 1999

• Hutchings v. Hutchings
• Jones v. Jones
• Salsman v. Salsman
• Aitken v. Aitken
• Patterson v. Patterson
• Chee v. Chee
• Schmidt v. Schmidt
• Huculak v. Huculak
• Phillips v. Phillps
• Shackleton v. Shackleton
• Armstrong v. Armstrong
• Reddy v. Reddy
• Trociuk v. British Columbia (Attorney General)
• Stanbridge v. Stanbridge
• Dornik v. Dornik
• De Bruyn v. De Bruyn
• Rail v. Rail
• Kovacic v. Kovacic
• Gee v. Tremain
• Duncan v. Duncan
• Sahyoun v. Director of Child, Family and Community Service
• De Beeld v. De Beeld
• Shannon v. Gidden
• Bell v. Bell
• Thibodeau v. Campbell
• Metzner v. Metzner
• Leung v. Leung
• Gunsay v. Gunsay
• McLean v. Russell
• Chafe v. Chafe
• Thornett v. Thornett
• Baker v. Baker
• Metzner v. Metzner
• L.S. v. E.P.
• Graham v. Graham
• Fullerton v. Fullerton
• Razutis v. Garrett
• Juretic et al. v. Ruiz et al
• Fox v. Stevens
• Cladwell v. Caldwell
• Trajan v. Trajan
• Liedtke v. Liedtke
• Wong v. Wong
• British Columbia (Director of Family and Child Services) v. S.A., A.S., and A.S.
• Fung-Sunter v. Fabian
• Sadler v. Sadler
• Livingstone v. Livingstone
• Olstead v. Olstead
• McKay v. Collins
• Pang v. Wong
• Campbell v. Mills
• Haldane v. Haldane
• Bouffard v. Bouffard
• McClure v. McClure
• Rogers v. Rogers
• Van Gool v. Van  Gool
• Poole v. Poole
• Pelli v. Pelli
• Kranenburg v. Kranenburg
• Anderson v. Anderson
• Thorne v. Thorne
• Ingimundson v. Meuser
• Anderson v. Anderson
• Andrusiek v. Andrusiek
• D.L. et al. v. Director of Children and Family
• McLaughlin v. McLaughlin
• Medley v. Medley
• Best et al. v. Young
• Schnarr v. Schnarr
• Mozaffari v. Mozaffari
• Maynard v. Maynard
• Langstaff v. Langstaff
• Stevenson v. Stevenson
• de Goede v. de Goede
• McPhee v. McPhee
• Collins v. Collins
• East v. East
• Ness v. Ness
• Podgorenko v. Podgorenko
• Coulter v. Coulter
• Vlasik v. Vlasik
• R. v. Cassidy
• Shankland v. Harper
• Tarling v. Tarling